Verithiathe honest score on any app
Updated July 2026 · real, multi-region App Store reviews
The verdict on

Washington Post

55
User verdict / 100 High confidence Divided

The Washington Post app is praised for its reliable journalism and quick loading, but recent user reviews express significant disappointment with a perceived decline in editorial quality and increased political bias, particularly since Jeff Bezos's ownership, alongside app functionality issues like loud ads and subscriber access problems.

4.7★ lifetime (631,241) Free + in-app purchases since 2010 by The Washington Post Company updated 0.1 mo ago recent negative 31% 120 reviews across 4 regions
Journalistic Quality & Bias App Functionality & Bugs Content Scope & Depth Trust in Reporting App Performance
5★481
4★108
3★62
2★58
1★232
recent reviews across 4 regions, vs the 4.7★ lifetime average

The Washington Post app generally receives positive feedback for its journalism quality and app performance, with many users trusting its reporting. However, a notable portion of recent reviews criticize a perceived shift in editorial stance, a reduction in content quality, and various technical glitches, leading to a mixed sentiment despite a high lifetime rating.

What users like

  • Journalism is generally trusted and considered reliable, providing factual and in-depth reporting.R2R5R6R12
  • The app loads quickly and has a small footprint on device storage.R4
  • Offers good coverage of national and international news, with some users appreciating specific sections like science, medical, and games.R12R31R65R74
  • The app is easy to navigate and provides a good online reading experience.R10R106

What users complain about

  • Many users perceive a significant decline in journalistic quality and an increase in political bias, particularly a shift towards a 'center-right' or 'MAGA-biased' editorial stance since Jeff Bezos's ownership.R1R8R11R15
  • The app has issues with loud, obnoxious, and repeated audio ads, which disrupt the reading experience.R42R43R45R57
  • Subscribers frequently encounter difficulties accessing content, being asked to re-authenticate or re-subscribe despite having an active subscription.R7R70
  • The app may not work on older iPad OS versions, opening to a blank screen, and users cannot download previous versions.R3
  • Content is perceived as less comprehensive, with less new news, reduced national and local coverage, and a decline in specific sections like sports and metro.R13R53R62R67
  • Some users report general bugginess, lag, and articles failing to load properly, while ads always appear.R288R443
  • The 'For You' section is criticized for being mandatory politics and not reflecting user-selected topics.R38
  • The inability to interact with comments (e.g., thumbs up) is a source of frustration.R30
  • Users desire more control over AI voice readers, preferring to select a voice rather than having one randomly assigned.R9

Latest update · v7.10.0

What the developer says changed (the verdict above weighs this against what reviewers report):

Bug fixes and performance improvements

Recurring themes

Journalistic Quality & Bias negative
Many recent reviews express strong dissatisfaction with a perceived decline in the Washington Post's journalistic quality and an increase in political bias, often described as a shift to 'center-right' or 'MAGA-biased' since Jeff Bezos's ownership. Users feel the paper has lost its objectivity, become a 'shadow of its former self,' and avoids stories critical of certain political figures. This contradicts the developer's general 'bug fixes and performance improvements' notes, as it's a content-related issue.R1R8R11R15
App Functionality & Bugs negative
Several users report issues with the app's functionality, including loud and repetitive audio ads, difficulty accessing content despite being a subscriber, and the app not working on older iPad OS versions. Some also mention general lag, articles failing to load, and an inability to interact with comments. These issues directly contradict the developer's claim of 'bug fixes and performance improvements' in the latest update.R3R7R30R42
Content Scope & Depth negative
Reviewers frequently lament a perceived reduction in the breadth and depth of content. Specific complaints include less new news, diminished national and local coverage, and a significant decline in sections like sports and metro. Some feel the paper is now a 'shadow' of its former self, lacking the comprehensive reporting it once had.R13R53R62R67
Trust in Reporting positive
Despite the negative sentiment around bias, a significant number of users still express trust in the Washington Post's reporting, viewing it as a reliable source of factual and unbiased news. They appreciate the dedication of its journalists and the in-depth coverage.R2R5R6R12
App Performance positive
Some users praise the app for its speed, quick loading times, and efficient use of storage space. They find it easy to navigate and appreciate the overall online experience.R4R10R106

Who it's for

This app is for users who prioritize trusted, factual journalism and appreciate a fast-loading news app R2R4R5. It is particularly suited for those who enjoy in-depth reporting, science, medical news, and games R12R31R65. It is NOT for users who are sensitive to political bias, especially a perceived 'center-right' or 'MAGA-biased' editorial stance, or those who are frustrated by loud audio ads and subscriber access issues R1R7R45. Users with older iPad OS versions should also be cautious, as the app may not function R3.

Evidence note: The recent reviews skew heavily negative regarding editorial bias and content quality, which contrasts sharply with the high lifetime rating. This suggests a recent downturn in user satisfaction, particularly concerning the paper's perceived political leanings and content changes. The app functionality issues are also consistently reported.

Frequently asked

Is The Washington Post app free?
The Washington Post app is free to download, but it includes in-app purchases and requires a subscription for full access to articles, as some users report being prompted to subscribe even after logging in R7R70.
Does The Washington Post app have audio ads?
Yes, The Washington Post app features audio ads that many users describe as loud, obnoxious, and repetitive, often disrupting the listening and reading experience R42R43R45R57.
Has the editorial stance of The Washington Post changed recently?
Many recent reviewers perceive a significant shift in The Washington Post's editorial stance, with numerous complaints about it becoming more 'center-right,' 'MAGA-biased,' or an 'apologist for plutocrats' since Jeff Bezos's ownership R1R8R11R15.

What reviewers actually said

Built only from these 120 real reviews (foreign ones translated). Superscripts jump to the quote here. Apple has no per-review links, so [ref] opens that app's reviews on the App Store.

  1. [R2] 5/5 · US The Washington Post: I really trust the news in the Post. I don’t think they lie about it!
  2. [R5] 5/5 · US The Post is Truth: Reading the work of professional journalists at The Washington Post reveals a dedication to the truth, reveals moral courage, reveals the true legacy of our nation’s founding fathers. It’s the perfect antidote to so much republican dishonesty & so little moral courage from right-wing politicians pundits judges.
  3. [R6] 5/5 · US Great Journalism: While I’m not a fan of Bezos, the journalists at the WaPo are independent and do the hard work of reporting facts. Well worth the money considering how easy it is to come across garbage being published online these days. By far my favorite paper!
  4. [R12] 5/5 · US Great App: The Washington Post to me is a reliable source of news. I feel that it is one of the premier newspapers in the country. I have found its reporting to be accurate and unbiased. I like it’s science and medical reporting as well as its recipes.
  5. [R4] 5/5 · US WAPO speedy app loads: The app loads quickly. It does not lave a large foot print of space on the HD. Two great features.
  6. [R31] 4/5 · US Yup: Yup. Good reporting. Yup. Up to date and accurate. Yup. Meaningful side stories. Yup. A good dose of culture. (Need I mention a great line-up of comic strips…?)
  7. [R65] 5/5 · US Love WASHINGTON POST - hooked on GAMES ‼️: THE BEST, MOST VARIETY OF GAMES. Excellent news as well!
  8. [R74] 5/5 · US Love sports section: Sports section very important and continues to be very informative.Thank you
  9. [R10] 5/5 · US Easy to navigate: Still getting used to it …but so far I like it…
  10. [R106] 5/5 · US WP online: The online WP provides accurate news coverage updated to my IPad before 5am daily. It is a great paperless option covering all aspects of the daily news.
  11. [R1] 3/5 · US WaPo is center right now and an apologist for plutocrats and economic inequality: WaPo is center right now and an apologist for plutocrats and economic inequality. They got rid of most of their liberal writers and dropped their sports coverage. They still do some decent investigative stories.
  12. [R8] 1/5 · US Darkness: The Washington post is bending at the knee to trump. It is awful
  13. [R11] 1/5 · US Sharp decline: The journalist quality of this newspaper declined steadily at first after its acquisition by Bezos then sharply in the last two years after Bezos forced management changes. Now, I still subscribe because I live in the DC area, and some good reporting is done. But the paper often is a mindless cheerleader from Trump and his oligarch pals. The newspaper should be given to a responsibl
  14. [R15] 1/5 · US One reason above all others to leave!: The WP Editorial Eoard is a tool to advance your owner’s style of “ elitist capitalism.” I love, capitalism, but I can’t stand greed! This paper has changed drastically since your owner has taken over. There are a lot of publications through which I can get accurate, unbiased news. I’ll be gone very soon.
  15. [R42] 1/5 · US Obnoxious ad. Goodbye: too soon, too loud
  16. [R43] 1/5 · US New screaming commercials: Recently, some ads are so loud. It sounds like they’re screaming. It’s startling. I’ve just now canceled my subscription.
  17. [R45] 1/5 · US Loud and obnoxious audio ads: If you’d like to listen to your news, The Washington Post is not the place to get it unless you’re willing to endure incredibly loud and obnoxious audio ads.
  18. [R57] 2/5 · US Repeated commercials: They repeat the same commercials after every so many stories on my playlist.
  19. [R7] 1/5 · US Good when it works: I subscribe to both the NYT and The Washington Post. When the NYT sends me an article by email, I can click on it and enter the article, including the audio. But with the Washington Post, you click on it and then they want you to prove that you’re really a subscriber. What’s your password? What’s your pets first name? It’s too much work. The Post needs to make it easier to be a
  20. [R70] 1/5 · US Paid Subscription but No Access: I have had problems where I pay for a subscription but when I try to open an article after logging in, it just wants to sell me another subscription.
  21. [R3] 1/5 · US New version downloads, but doesn't work on older iPad OSs!!: Doesn't work on an iPad 9 with iPad OS 17.7.2. Tap the icon and it opens to a blank screen. Thought the Apple Store blocked downloading incompatible apps! Please fix this, Post! Upgrading the OS is not an option as it slows down the tablet, uses more battery life, and breaks older apps. If you can't fix it, at least let us download
  22. [R13] 2/5 · US Little new news: Just so little new news every day. 90%+ seems to just be recycled from the day before or even many days before. I returned after almost a year with another paper and I am now remembering why I left. Disappointed.
  23. [R53] 5/5 · US The new Washington Post: The good news is that the new op-ed and opinion pages are much better, reflecting more balance and support for freedom and free markets. Unfortunately the sports page and metro section is a shell of its former self, while the Style section is a parody of these sort of things.
  24. [R62] 1/5 · US Destruction of a once premier news outlet: Since Bezo’s has taken over the Post has gone down the toilet. So many excellent reporters let go, Sports reporting almost nonexistent. What a shame.
  25. [R67] 1/5 · US The Post is a faint shadow of its former self: I got stuck with most of a full year’s subscription after the Post fired many reporters. The news coverage is spotty and often ridiculous in judgment. The Sports section, which I once loved, has become a joke. The editorial writers are mostly pathetic (Max Boot is an exception). This was a proud tradition, now gone to waste.
  26. [R288] 3/5 · GB Laggy: User interface is not as hassle free and easy to navigate as the New York Times or Apple’s news app. There are lags.
  27. [R443] 3/5 · GB Kind of buggy: 1st few articles load quickly. But after that, random paragraphs won't load, or article will fail to render at all. The ads always show up though.
  28. [R38] 2/5 · US ‘ For you ‘: The ‘for you’ column that’s fixed to the front is all mandatory politics about the White House and nothing related to the topics I picked. And the layout is so stiff not user friendly. Fox CNN free version does it better.
  29. [R30] 2/5 · US An *APP* review: If I could teach the world to sing… When writing a review on the AppStore you are answering one question: Does the *app* work? THIS app is okay, although I am completely unable to interact with comments. I’m signed in, but I can’t even give a thumbs up to someone else’s post. Frustrating. On a personal note, there’s no such thing as unbiased news in 2026. Read widely and you’
  30. [R9] 5/5 · US I would like to select an AI voice reader not have WaPo randomly assign one.: I’m thankful for WaPo allowing me to listen to articles. However, we all have differing hearing levels. Certain voices can distract from the message. That’s the case in your approach to assigning AI generated voices to read articles. For me a higher pitched voice that sounds like a teenager reading a serious article di
  31. [R445] 3/5 · GB About to introduce subscription . . .: Unfortunately subscription charging is coming, so I'll be getting off at this stop. Shame, my previous review is below (I've reduced the star rating now from 4 to 3) ----- With the UK so closely aligned to the US, this publication provides wide ranging reports on both US domestic & foreign policy news as well as the American perspective on global events.

Synthesized from 120 recent App Store reviews · updated July 2026 · View on the App Store