Verithiathe honest score on any app
Updated July 2026 · real, multi-region App Store reviews
Head-to-head

Matter vs GoodLinks

Matter 4.6★ · Free to download 60
Winner GoodLinks
GoodLinks 4.7★ · $9.99 85

GoodLinks is the better choice for users seeking a reliable, private, and well-designed read-it-later app with a one-time purchase, while Matter offers more advanced AI-driven features and content discovery but struggles with reliability and customer support.

GoodLinks offers a stable, privacy-focused read-it-later experience with a one-time purchase, excelling in core functionality and user interface. Matter, while ambitious with AI features and content discovery, is plagued by bugs, unreliable article saving, and poor customer support, alongside a subscription-only model.

Head to head

Features & Functionality tieR2R3R5R9
Matter Matter offers advanced features like AI readers, article summaries, newsletter redirection, and RSS feed integration, which many users appreciate R2R5. However, many of these features are reported as buggy or unreliable; PDF and email ingestion often fail R3R10, podcast transcription is inconsistent , and RSS feeds don't always work . Some users also report losing features after updates R9R13.
GoodLinks GoodLinks focuses on core read-it-later functionality, providing reliable article saving, robust tagging, and a clean reading experience R77R85R115. Recent updates added highlighting , but users still desire features like folders for organization and AI summaries . It handles various media types, including reels .
Ease of Use & User Interface edge: GoodLinksR2R4R5R10
Matter Matter is praised for its beautiful interface and clean reading experience R2R26. Adding articles via the share sheet is simple R5, and newsletter integration helps reduce clutter . However, some users find the formatting obnoxious R10, and basic functions like search are described as half-baked R45. Login issues and unresponsive buttons are also reported R4.
GoodLinks GoodLinks is consistently lauded for its intuitive, clean, and thoughtful UI/UX . Users find it simple to save links and organize them with tags . It integrates well across Apple devices . Some minor interface complaints include unreadable faded grey for read items and a desire for UI element resizing .
Reliability & Performance edge: GoodLinksR1R3R10R25
Matter Matter suffers from significant reliability issues. Article scraping frequently fails, especially from Apple News and paywalled sites R1R3. Email and PDF ingestion are inconsistent R3R10. Transcription services often don't work or take excessively long . Users report lost data after updates R25 and general bugginess .
GoodLinks GoodLinks is praised for its stability and reliability in saving and parsing articles R100R115. It syncs flawlessly between devices and works well across the Apple ecosystem . However, some users report issues with the Chrome extension , failure to save full links , and occasional parsing problems with specific layouts . One user also reported a broken shortcut after an update .
Price & Value edge: GoodLinksR1R7R8R26
Matter Matter is criticized for its high subscription price ($14.99/month or $79.99/year) and misleading claims of a free service R1R26R27R28. Many users feel the price is too steep, especially given the app's unreliability and buggy features R1R8. There are also complaints about predatory subscription tactics and trials not working R1R7.
GoodLinks GoodLinks is highly valued for its one-time purchase model ($9.99) and absence of recurring subscriptions R85. Users appreciate not having to pay monthly for core features like highlighting . However, some long-time users are upset that newer features are now behind an additional subscription paywall, feeling ignored . It is not a universal purchase across all Apple devices .
Customer Support edge: GoodLinksR4R6R9R13
Matter Matter's customer support is a major pain point. Users report unresponsive support, unanswered tickets, and needing to write bad reviews to get attention R4R6R9R13. Issues like email confirmation not arriving or subscription problems are not resolved effectively R4.
GoodLinks GoodLinks generally receives positive feedback for its developer responsiveness and top-tier support for Apple devices . However, at least one user reported no response to a support request regarding page downloading issues , and another mentioned a password change without permission .
Pick Matter if

you prioritize advanced features like AI-powered audio readers, article summaries, and integrated newsletter management, and are willing to tolerate bugs and a subscription model R2R5.

Pick GoodLinks if

you value a reliable, private, and beautifully designed read-it-later app with a one-time purchase, and prefer a focus on core functionality over advanced, potentially buggy, AI features R77R85.

Evidence note: Matter's lifetime rating is slightly lower than GoodLinks, and recent reviews for Matter are heavily skewed negative, often citing issues with reliability, pricing, and customer support, which contrasts with its overall lifetime rating. GoodLinks has a strong positive sentiment, though some long-time users express frustration over new features being paywalled.

Frequently asked

Does Matter offer a free version?
Matter's description claims a free service, but many users report that it only offers a limited 7-day free trial before requiring a paid subscription of $14.99/month or $79.99/year R27R28R40R49.
Can GoodLinks save articles from paywalled sites?
GoodLinks is generally praised for its ability to parse and save almost any article, including those that other subscription-based apps struggle with R100R115.
Which app is better for organizing saved content?
GoodLinks excels in organization with robust and flexible tagging, which users find very effective for managing links R77R85. Matter offers tagging and a queue, but some users find its content management lacking, with issues like difficulty with bulk deletion R9R45.

What reviewers actually said

Built only from these 120 real reviews (foreign ones translated). Superscripts jump to the quote here. Apple has no per-review links, so [ref] opens that app's reviews on the App Store.

  1. [R2] Matter 5/5 · US Essential: I’m a longtime read-later app user, from Feedly to Reeder to Instapaper and beyond. I’ve been using matter since it launched a few years ago, and it’s surpassed them all. I love its ability to redirect newletters so my mailbox stays clean. It allows me to save, favorite, and highlight my favorite articles and newsletters. Its AI “readers” are the most natural and “listenable” I’ve exper
  2. [R3] Matter 3/5 · US Great concept, mediocre execution: I love the concept of the app, but it falls far short of being your go-to reading app. It’s very difficult to get PDFs or text emails into the app. Sometimes the emails are in your queue quickly, and sometimes they don’t show up at all. The browser extension sometimes pulls in the article, and sometimes it only creates a browser link, which is no better than a
  3. [R5] Matter 5/5 · US Simple, powerful, reading queue: Matter comes to fill the gap after Pocket closed down, and I love its simplicity and useful features. Finding things to read in the discover or related articles section is nice. You can also add newsletters or rss feeds. Adding things to read later is simple as using the share sheet anywhere on iOS or via browser extensions for other devices. With premium you get
  4. [R9] Matter 3/5 · US Let down by unresponsive Customer Support (update): They finally responded. It seems you need to write a bad review for the to pay attention which is a shame. New version is nice, and Matter is probably still the best app to organize your reading, but some key features have gone for no good reason (they confirmed it). A good example is the ability for bulk delete both in your inbox and archive.
  5. [R4] Matter 2/5 · US Can use with only one device: I tried to get it in mt phone. But my email confirmation never arrives. I wrote the company - check spam/junk, which I of course had done. No other help available I gave up and deleted it. After several emails back and forth, they never did anything with the information I gave them April Update I thought I’d give them another chance. Still no email confirmation rec
  6. [R10] Matter 1/5 · US Tried matter, but the app is a waste of time.: It downloads most webpages fine, but the way it formats them is sometimes obnoxious and counterintuitive. I looked past it because they claim in multiple places the app can download PDFs and easily convert them for reading with all the features they advertise. I tried 4 PDFs and only one worked. I tried going premium (used the free trial) and same pro
  7. [R1] Matter 1/5 · US Better Than Instapaper, Not: Hi folks, I can’t recommend this app. Downloaded it got a very slick email from the CEO extolling its wonderful virtues. Then a very clever way to upgrade a pro trial. Well, their trial didn’t work so well. And Matter didn’t perform any better than Instapaper frequently coming up with a pathetic excuse that it couldn’t scrape articles from Apple News. Overpriced and
  8. [R25] Matter 1/5 · US I’ve lost all my data after update: Will never use it again. My reading list disappeared after update.
  9. [R7] Matter 1/5 · US Beware Predatory Subscription Tactics: App is okay, however, upon opening it, I was confronted with a subscription offer that promised a trial. Unfortunately, I did not receive a trial, and $14.99 was deducted from my account. Within 5 minutes, I attempted to request a refund from Apple, I was informed that it was not eligible. I cannot endorse any application that conducts business in this manner
  10. [R8] Matter 4/5 · US Pretty good, missing a few things: A widget for unread articles would be a game changer, or the option to buy once. I just can’t justify paying monthly.
  11. [R26] Matter 5/5 · US Beautiful and useful app: I enjoy it so much.
  12. [R6] Matter 3/5 · US Good App, Bad Support: I like what this app has to offer, but I don’t have anything nice to say about the support. I’ve opened multiple tickets with the support team via the Slack channel available via the app and I’ve heard nothing in weeks.
  13. [R13] Matter 1/5 · US Used to Love…: I used this app to aggregate articles into a single file to send to my Kindle. Other apps allow single article send and it is very messy. I was enjoying the app; then the update happened. I lost the ability to do the only thing I used the app for. I contacted the company several times but never received a reply. I have Readwise, which is incredibly responsive. Rating a 1 because I c
  14. [R27] Matter 3/5 · US There is no free plan: After the 7-day free trial the options are: $79.99/year $14.99/month It’s a pretty ok app, but I don’t like the lack of transparency or documentation.
  15. [R28] Matter 1/5 · US Description is a lie: “Matter offers a free service and a paid service.” No, only a paid service.
  16. [R40] Matter 1/5 · US No free option, $80 read it later app: Really annoyed by these psychological and statistically optimal onboarding procedures that ask you a million questions and make you create an account before they reveal that there is only a limited 7 day trial before you’re paying. I’m so over wasting my time with these apps that are so confident in themselves that they think there’s no way you’re not going t
  17. [R49] Matter 1/5 · US Description does not match - Not free: Disappointed that they say you can either have a free subscription or a premium subscription. It is supposed free for 7 days before you are charged a monthly service. Sorry. Not for me. Either have a free subscription or be open and honest upfront that it is free for 7 days but then you will be charged. I could have not wasted my time.
  18. [R100] GoodLinks 5/5 · US Best Read it Later App out There!: I’ve used a lot of link saving and read-it-later type apps, including ones that are quite expensive. None have been as good as GoodLinks. The best thing about this app is that it can parse just about any article out there. Including things other subscription-based RIL apps could not. The design of GoodLinks is also beautiful, and it’s very easy to use on iOS
  19. [R115] GoodLinks 5/5 · US Must have: This is one of those old fashioned app that don’t costs a ton and yet provides unprecedented quality of what’s doing. I’ve tried almost all of this kind of apps in AppStore, many of them made well in terms of sorting and storing the saved data, a lot of them has an option to download whole article to you device. Almost none of them doing that reliably enough, this one does. This was
  20. [R45] Matter 3/5 · US Style over substance: Pocket (new Read It Later) refugee here. Pretty app with some interesting features (cf. Inbox) but basic functionality is lacking. To name a few functions: saving articles, managing the queue, quick swipe actions (e.g., open in browser, send to top, archive), web extension, and search. Virtually all of these are half baked or straight up broken like search (see below). I'd
  21. [R77] GoodLinks 5/5 · US Perfect pocket replacement: Can’t say enough good things about this app. The tagging feature is robust and flexible, it works well across all devices, and the reader is slick. Worth every penny.
  22. [R85] GoodLinks 5/5 · US Great replacement for Pocket: Goodlinks has a clean interface, a great safari extension, easy tagging, syncs to icloud, doesn't collect your data, and offers a cheap permanent license. Also I imported all of my pocket saves with no problem. Looked at more expensive (and less private) apps. No thanks. This one does everything I need.

Synthesized from 120 recent App Store reviews · updated July 2026 · View on the App Store